|
It is an established
fact that rootstocks provide a different root system to the scion. The
selective absorption of nutrients by the scions due to changed root
system can be profitably employed in eliminating the absorption of toxic
elements. Similarly, roots being the sites for the synthesis of
cytokinins, which have been demonstrated to be pivotal in fruit bud
differentiation, there is scope for manipulating the productivity of
vines through rootstocks.
The choice of
rootstocks is more difficult than generally believed. This is due to
interaction between the rootstock, environment and the scion.
Fortunately, for the growers of our country the twin problems of
Phylloxera and nematodes and so also the problem of viruses
affecting the vine industry elsewhere in the world, does not pose any
threat. This situation has helped to a large extent in narrowing down
the difficult task of selection.
Among the many
rootstocks introduced and tested in India only two have shown their
potential. They are Dogridge (Vitis champinii) and Salt
Creek (Vitis champinii).
The problem of soil
salinity is fast spreading posing a threat to viticulture industry in
Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Northern districts of Karnataka. Heavy
application of fertilizers, intensive cultivation, faulty management and
poor quality of water accentuate the salt problem in grapes.
Accumulation of chlorides is two to three times higher in cultivars.
Rootstocks exclude the salts even under saline conditions. Proportion of
potassium in rootstocks is many folds higher than in popular cultivars
on their own roots. Under saline conditions, the symptoms of salt injury
appear in the leaves based on the stage of the crop growth, types of
soil, variety and environmental factors in relation to the accumulation
of chloride and sodium.
Rootstocks Dogridge
and Salt Creek have been noticed as best chloride +excluders. These
rootstocks today have been used most successfully on soils of low
fertility. Their vigorous growth nature is found to be more useful
under saline conditions. Performance of Dogridge rootstock especially
under black soils and medium black soils has shown lot of promise both
in Maharashtra and Bijapur district of Karnataka. Thompson Seedless
grafted to this rootstock has shown excellent vigour, resulting in ideal
canopy when trained to Y trellis or expanded Y trellis. The leaves of
Thompson Seedless or Tas-A-Ganesh have not exhibited the salt injury
symptoms even when saline water was being used, when they were grafted
on Dogridge or Salt Creek. The tendency of these rootstocks to take up
more nitrogen did not affect the productivity of scion cultivar.
Balancing soil
fertility and scion vigour with rootstock vigour has thus become very
important as a new approach in canopy management of grape vines.
Eventhough, many horticultural practices like use of growth retardants,
inducing sub canes, modified training systems etc., are very useful and
proven tools to check the vine vigour, but imparting vigour to a
cultivar to improve the leaf to fruit ratio is possible probably by use
of vigorous rootstocks generally bean only recently, so there are few
immature vineyards to use as guides in rootstock selection. However,
some of the vineyards on Dogridge rootstock which are well managed are
showing the promise of giving higher yield, with some of the problems
like time of planting, training the rootstocks, grafting procedure,
grafting time, etc., being standardized, growers now face fewer problems
on these lines. With the standardizing of ideal training system (Y
trellis) and spacing to be adopted, when needs to be worked out is the
water requirement and nutrient management strategies as these rootstocks
are known to possess drought tolerant mechanism in addition to greater
nutrient uptake qualities. A balance of these two feature needs to be
worked out to evolve a suitable water nutrient input strategy so that
with lesser inputs the wide and deep rooting habits of these rootstocks
are exploited to the maximum.
II- HIGH DENSITY PLANTING IN BANANA
Banana is the fourth
important food crop in terms of gross value exceeded only by paddy,
wheat and milk products. In India, banana contributes to nearly 32% of
the total fruit production.
The normal spacing
provided for `Robusta’ and `Dwarf Cavendish’ is either 2.1 m x 2.1 m
(2267 plants/ha) or 1.8 m x 1.8 m (3086 plants/ha) with yield levels of
60-65 tons per ha. In recent years, the emphasis has been on increasing
the productivity per unit area by following closer spacing. A closer
spacing can be adopted under good management conditions using
micro-irrigation and fertigation techniques. However, a major limiting
factor in banana high density planting will be the sunlight which
affects flowering, crop duration and maturity and also on the
performance of ratoon crop.
|
Planting material |
Sword
suckers with well-developed rhizome, conical in shape and actively
growing control buds weighing 600-750 g are ideal. |
|
Cultivar |
Robusta/Dwarf Cavendish |
|
Planting time |
All
round the year, best yield when planted during February-March |
|
Planting density |
A
plant density of 4444/ha (1.5 m x 1.5 m spacing) |
|
Pit
size |
2 ft x
2 ft x 2 ft |
|
Fertilizer dose |
Soil application : FYM 40 t/ha,
200g N-100 g P2O5-200 g K2O/plant/crop
Fertigation:150 g N and 150 g K2O/plant/crop |
|
Irrigation |
Irrigate the crop when the cumulative pan evaporation values reach
45-50 mm under conventional methods of irrigation. Under drip
irrigation, replenishment of 80% of evaporation losses is
recommended on a daily basis. |
|
Bunch weight |
25-28
kg |
|
Yield |
100-120 t/ha |
|
Advantages of fertigation |
a) Higher productivity
b) Economy in fertilizer use
through fertigation
c) Higher
fertilizer use efficiency
d) Advantage
of using required fertilizer at any stage of crop growth |
Economic Analysis of High Density
Banana Production (per hectare)
|
Cost of
cultivation |
Plant crop (Rs.) |
Ratoon crop (Rs.) |
|
I. Preparatory cultivation |
|
Land preparation |
1,000-00 |
--- |
|
Digging of pits (4444 pits) (1.5
m x 1.5 m spacing) (Rs.200/100 pits) |
8,888-00 |
--- |
|
Filling the pits and planting
suckers (Rs.80/manday) |
4,500-00 |
--- |
|
Cost of the suckers (4,600 nos.)
Rs.1.50 each |
6,900-00 |
--- |
|
II. Manuring |
|
Cost of FYM (40 tons @ 100/ton) |
4,000-00 |
4,000-00 |
|
Urea (1950 kg/crop) Rs.4.78/kg |
9,321-00 |
9,321-00 |
|
Single Super Phosphate (2775
kg/crop) Rs.3.24/kg |
8,991-00 |
8,991-00 |
|
Muriate of Potash (1480 kg/crop)
Rs.4.40/kg |
6,512-00 |
6,512-00 |
|
Fertilizer application (4
times/crop) 30 mandays @ Rs.80/manday |
2,400-00 |
2,400-00 |
|
III. Inter-culture operations |
|
Irrigation, earthing up, weeding,
de-suckering and propping |
15,000-00 |
15,000-00 |
|
Cost of propping material @
Rs.20/pair of poles |
80,000-00 |
--- |
|
Irrigation @ 100/irrigation (40
irrigations) |
4,000-00 |
4,000-00 |
|
IV. Plant protection |
10,000-00 |
10,000-00 |
|
V. Harvesting 30 mandays @
Rs.80 per Manday |
2,400-00 |
2,400-00 |
|
|
1,63,912-00 |
62,624-00 |
|
B. RETURNS |
|
|
|
Price of 3,500 bunches with 25 kg
bunch (main crop) and 3,000 bunches of 20 kg bunch (ratoon crop) @
Rs.3.50/kg |
3,06,250-00 |
2,10,000-00 |
|
Value of suckers @ Rs.1.50/sucker |
10,000-00 |
20,000-00 |
|
Total Returns |
3,16,250-00 |
2,30,000-00 |
|
Total Expenditure |
1,63,912-00 |
62,624-00 |
|
|
1,52,338-00 |
1,67,376-00 |
Net profit of Rs.3,19,714/ha. could
be realised from the main and ratoon crops of banana.
III-High Density Planting in Pineapple
Pineapple (Ananas
comosus) is one of the important commercial fruits of the world with
great demand in the international market. A few decades ago, the
planting density followed for pineapple in India were only fifteen to
twenty thousand plants per hectare, with a productivity of less than
twenty thousand tones fruit per hectare, resulting in high cost of
production. Under such low density planting, 20 to 25 % fruits become
unmarketable due to sunburn in the tropical region. Therefore, extensive
studies were undertaken at the Indian Institute of Horticultural
Research, Bangalore, during the 1970’s and 80’s to develop high density
planting of pineapple for increasing the productivity and fruit quality
and reducing the cost of production. These studies proved the benefits
of increased planting density in the range of 53,000 to 63,500 plants
per hectare.
Two-row trench system
of planting has been found to be the best for high density planting in
the plains, whether the crop is grown with or without irrigation. The
field is laid out into 22.5 to 30.0 cm deep trenches alternating with
mounds. In each trench, two shallow furrows about 10 to 15 cm deep and
15 cm inside from the edge of the trench are opened and suckers or slips
are planted in these furrows, so arranged that two plants will not be
exactly opposite to each other. Spacing of pineapple plants depend on
the growth of the plant. Soil moisture and fertility influences plant
growth and indirectly determine spacing required per plant and
eventually planting density. In overall analysis, plant-to-plant spacing
of 22.5 to 25.0 cm and row-to-row spacing of 45 to 60 cm are ideal.
Where pineapple plants grow luxuriantly with long leaves, a wider
spacing of 90 cm between the trenches is required, but in places where
growth of the leaf is moderate, a trench-to-trench spacing of 75 cm is
adequate. A plant density of 63,000 plants/ha (22.5 cm x 60 cm x 75 cm)
has been found ideal in semiarid mild tropical areas. In hot and humid
tropical areas, plant density of 53,000 plants/ha (25 cm x 60 cm x 90
cm) performs well. However, decrease in fruit weight was quite evident
when plant-to-plant spacing was reduced to 20 cm and row-to-row to 40 cm
irrespective of the spacing between beds.
Initial establishment
of planting material in the field is important to avoid gaps and the
subsequent poor growth of replants under the competitive situation of
high planting density. Suckers weighing 500-600g and slips weighing
350-400g are the best for initial field establishment under high density
planting. July-August is found to be the best season of planting for
establishment and growth of plants. To avoid any reduction in fruit size
to unmarketable levels due to interplant competition for plant
nutrients, nutrient management of high-density orchards need to be done
more scientifically than under low-density planting, to meet the
requirements of each and every plant. Nitrogen at 12g under irrigated
and 16g under rainfed conditions along with potash at 12g per plant is
recommended for the plant crop. For irrigated and rainfed ratoon crops,
10g nitrogen and 12g potash are recommended per plant. Ammonium sulphate
is the best source of N
The yields recorded
under high-density planting are in the range of 85 to105 tones/ha, which
are 55 to 85 tones more than the conventional planting densities,
without adversely affecting the fruit size, quality and canning
recovery. It is associated with other advantages like less weed
infestation, protection to fruits from sunburn and increased production
of suckers and slips per unit area, and non-lodging of plants. Close
planting also saves on the upright orientation of the apical leaves, and
eventually results in uniformly coloured lustrous fruits, which are
cylindrical with low taper ratio, giving more canning recovery. Another
advantage of high-density planting is the overlapping of basal leaves
forming a sort of natural covering over the soil, preventing evaporation
losses and thereby resulting in moisture conservation. Under dense
planting a microclimate with high humidity will be created around the
plant, which is congenial for growth and fruiting. Two successive ratoon
crops harvested at twelve monthly intervals amounted to 50.7 and 53.8%
of the plant crop yield at high-density planting under good management.
Highest cost : benefit ratio of 1: 4.2 was observed in planting
densities of 53,000 and 59,200 plants/ha.
Table 1. The spacing
required for different plant populations per hectare.
|
Plant
population per hectare |
Distance (cm) |
|
Plant-to-plant
within a row |
Row-to-row |
Trench-to-trench |
|
43,500 |
30.0 |
60.0 |
90.0 |
|
53,300 |
25.0 |
60.0 |
90.0 |
|
63,700 |
22.5 |
60.0 or 45.0 |
75.0 or 90.0 |
Table 2. Cost
of cultivation and returns from one hectare of Kew pineapple with high
density planting of 53,000 plants ha-1 (45 x 90 x 135 cm) compared to
traditional planting density of 19,000 plants ha-1 (25 x 60 x 90 cm) for
one crop and three crop cycles.
|
SNo. |
Items |
Single crop
cycle - plant crop only |
Three crop
cycle - plant crop + two ratoons |
|
Traditional |
High density |
Traditional |
High density |
|
1 |
Fruit yield (t ha-1) |
24 |
70 |
50 |
147 |
|
2 |
Expenditure (Rs.ha-1) |
11,400 |
33,723 |
17,600 |
56,649 |
|
3 |
Gross returns (Rs.ha-1) |
36,000 |
1,05,000 |
75,000 |
2,20,500 |
|
4 |
Net returns (Rs.ha-1) |
24,000 |
71,277 |
57,400 |
1,63,851 |
|
5 |
Benefit cost ratio |
2.16:1 |
2.11:1 |
3.26:1 |
2.89:1 |

Figure 1. Layout of pineapple plot
for population density of 43,500 plants/hectar
IV . USE OF NEEM AND PONGAMIA SOAPS IN
THE IPM OF CABBAGE AND OTHER VEGETABLES
Adverse effects of
pesticides on the environment and food are well known. Therefore efforts
are being made to develop eco-friendly and safe pesticides throughout
the world. Neem seed kernel extract has been found to be highly
effective on many insect pests. However, availability of neem seeds, the
drudgery of preparing the extract and long lasting bad smell of the neem
extract have been the main limitations in making it more popular.
Scientists at the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore,
have developed a simple product of neem oil- neem soap. This is in the
form of paste an is easily soluble in water and is very effective in
controlling many insect pests like the notorious diamondback moth of
cabbage and cauliflower, leaf miner in tomato, cucurbits and melon fruit
fly in many cucurbits. In addition to neem soap, the soap made from
another Indian plant, pongamia, was also very effective on many insect
pests. The soaps are easily soluble in water and sprayed thoroughly to
cover the plant surface. The droplet of the spray should fall on the
insects for controlling them.
Both neem and
pongamia (also known as karanj) are native to India and the oils are
easily available in most parts of India. Hence, farmers with a little
knowledge of chemistry can prepare the soaps and use them in insect pest
management of vegetables like cabbage, cauliflower, tomato, cucurbits
etc.
Principle:
Soap is prepared by adding alkali to oil. The pH is neutralized by
adding sulphuric acid. Potassium hydroxide soap is safe to plants.
Hence, potassium hydroxide is used in preparing neem and pongamia soaps
for agriculture use. This soap contains about 60% soap. Rest are
glycerol and adjutants. The soap spray droplets fall on the insect and
block the spiracles and if effective knocks down the insect with in 24
h. The residual toxicity of soap is very low. At high temperatures of
more than 320C these may not be effective. Both neem and pongamia soaps
are equally effective.
Chemicals/Materials
required for preparing soaps:
-
Neem oil or
pongamia oil
-
Sulphuric acid
(commercial grade)
-
Potassium hydroxide
pellets or flakes (Commercial grade)
-
Elemental Sulphur
(Commercial grade)
-
Kaolin powder
(Commercial Grade)
-
Gum Arabic or gum
powder
-
Plastic buckets
(according to the quantity of oil, soap required)
-
Measuring cylinders
(100, 500 and 2 litre)
-
Litmus paper to
test pH
-
Thermometer
(calibrated upto 1200C)
-
Balance to weigh up
to 5 kg (sensitivity to 5 gm)
-
Immersion coil
heater (2 KW)
Preparation of
Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) solution: Weigh 500 gm of potassium
hudroxide (commercial grade) and put in to a bucket /beaker and add 500
ml water. Stir and dissolve. According to requirement prepare KOH
solution.
Preparation of
Sulphuric acid solution: add 25 ml sulphuric acid to 80 ml water
carefully. This is a bit risky but with experience, it can be done
easily.
Preparation of Gum
powder solution: Dissolve 100 gm gum in 1 litre water
Preparation of
sulphur and kaolin paste: Take 100 ml water in a beaker and add
water little by little to 50 gm sulphur powder and 50 gm kaolin and
prepare a fine paste. Only when the paste is ready add remaining water.
Other wise instead of paste pellets will be formed.
Procedure: Measure
10 litre oil and keep in a plastic bucket. Hang the immersion coil fully
immersed in oil and heat. Take care to see that coil does not touch the
sides of the bucket. When the temperature reaches 1100C, stop heating.
Wait until the temperature comes down to 900 C. At 900C add slowly 2
litres of KOH solution. Stir now and then and wait until the temperature
comes down to 600C. At this point add sulphuric acid solution little by
little. Never pour continuously. Add small quantity and stir. Like this
continue to do until the soap becomes thick. Test pH using a litmus
paper now and then and adjust the pH to 7. Keep overnight and add 100
ml gum solution and 100 gm paste (sulpur+ kaolin) to 1 kg soap and mix
thoroughly.
Testing the
toxicity: Dissolve 5 gm soap in 1 litre water and spray to a cabbage
plant inefested with diamondback moth larvae. Observe mortality the next
day. If mortality of more than 60% is observed, then the soap is of good
quality.
Shelf life:
Upto 3 months at temperatures below 300C.
Use of Soaps in IPM:
Cabbage: The
most notorious pest of cabbage is diamondback moth. For managing this
pest spray 1% soap at 10 and 20 DAP and repeat at 10-15 days interval
2-3 more times according to pest incidence. If the droplet does not fall
on the insect mortality will not be observed. Hence, thorough coverage
is important to get good control. However, when the temperature is more
than 320 C, the effect of soap gets reduced drastically. Hence, under
such weather conditions it may not be effective. If aphids are observed,
mix the soap solution with dimethoate (2 ml/litre) and spray. Instead of
mixing dimethoate, spot application of dimethoate alone can be done over
the plants infested with aphids (generally here and there in a plot).
Tomato:
In tomato, leaf
miner, red spider mite and fruit borers are the major problems. The
spray of soaps reduces all these pests, but not completely. Hence,
follow the following package in tomato:
-
Spray soaps at 28,
35 and 42 days after planting.
-
If red spider mite
is observed, spray after mixing with acaricide (recommended doses).
Spray lower surface of leaves. Then only mite can be controlled.
-
Mechanically
collect and destroy borer and bored fruits periodically.
Cucurbits:
Apply neem soap/pongamia soaps (1%) at flowering and repeat sprays at
10 days interval to reduce leaf miner fruit fly. Destroy all fruit fly
infested fruits completely at each harvest.
Other crops:
Many farmers have tried the use of soaps in different crops. It was
found effective ein reducing leaf miner and hoppers in many other crops
like citrus and mango.
Cost of soaps:
From 1 litre oil 1.4
kg soap can be produced. At the prevailing rate of neem oil (Rs. 40/kg)
cost works out to be about Rs. 55/kg. For pongamia soap ( pongamia oil
cost @ Rs. 30/kg) it is slightly lower at Rs. 45 per kg. One hectare
requires about 8-10 kg of soap for one spray. For successful cultivation
of any crop one has to follow the Integrated pest and disease management
and one should not rely only on one particular method. For 5 sprays of
soaps for one cabbage crop it comes to 40-50 kg/ha for one crop. Hence,
cost for one hectare comes to maximum of Rs. 2750/ha, (if farmer himself
prepares the soap).
Yield:
By spraying neem and pongamia
soaps, the damage due to insect pests like diamondback moth in cabbage
and cauliflower, fruit borer and leaf miner in tomato, fruit fly and
leaf miners in cucurbits can be reduced. The potential yield in each
crop according to variety will be realized when it is accompanied by
integrated crop management. In cabbage and tomato yields of more than 70
t can be realized in hybrids.
Following points have
to be kept in mind while using these soaps :
-
Soaps act mostly by
contact. The spray droplet has to fall on the target insect. Hence,
spray coverage is very important for effective control and mortality
has be observed within 24 hours. Other wise, it has to be concluded
that the spray is not effective.
-
The effect may vary
according to crops, coverage of spray and weather parameters. Under
high temperature regimes it will not be effective.
-
Too much and too
frequent spraying is not advisable as these may be phytotoxic and also
effect plant growth.
V- TRICHORICH - N FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NEMATODES IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS
Trichorich – N
is a formulation biological control agent with an organic carrier. It
contains nematode biocontrol agents namely Trichoderma
harzianum and Paecilomyces lilacinus.
IIHR has the
facilities to mass produce this product. If any one wants huge
quantities one has to pay 50% cost of the product required, at the time
of indenting, to the Director, IIHR.
Nursery bed
treatment
Treat the nursery
beds with this formulation at the rate of 50g/sq.m. (This treatment
can be combined with the application of pongamia cake @ 200 g/sq.m or
Carbofuran/phorate @ 20g/sq.m. or 50 g inoculum (containing 20
chlamydospores/g) of endomycorrhizae (G. mosseae) per one sq.m) before
sowing. All these combinations did not affect the bio-efficacy of
bio-agents, but had additive effect on the management of nematodes.
Enrichment of farm
yard manure for the Main field treatment
The
formulation can be used for enriching farm yard manure (FYM) by
applying 2 kg of the any one of formulations + forty kg of neem or
pongamia cake to one ton of FYM. This should be left for 15 days under
the shade. It is advisable to maintain optimum moisture for the better
enrichment of FYM with the bio-agent. After 15 days the FYM can be used
for applying to the main field at the rate of 2 tonns/acre.
FYM enriched with the
bio-agents can be applied @ 2 kg/plant along with 500 grams of pongamia
cake before planting and once in every 3 months after planting for the
management of root-knot nematodes on banana, acid lime, papaya,
pomegranate and roses under the farmers field conditions.
This was tested in
the crops mentioned below. Economic analysis of the use of this product
resulted in the gereration of the following data. (In Rupees)
|
Sl.No |
Name of the
crop |
Cost of the
bio-agent application per one acre (Marginal cost – MC )
|
Additional
Revenue from one acre
(Marginal
Revenue - MR) |
MC : MR
(Cost benefit
ratio) |
|
1 |
Tomato |
325 |
1050 |
1:3.2 |
|
2 |
Onion |
400 |
1400 |
1: 3.5 |
|
3 |
Capsicum |
325 |
1250 |
1:3.8 |
|
4 |
Egg plant |
325 |
850 |
1:2.6 |
|
5 |
Okra |
500 |
1000 |
1:2 |
|
6 |
Carrot |
500 |
1400 |
1:2.8 |
|
7 |
Palak |
500 |
1500 |
1:3 |
|
8 |
Crossandra |
350 |
1700 |
1:4.9 |
|
9 |
Carnations |
1000 ( in 100 sq.m. in poly ouse) |
2400 |
1:2.4 |
|
10 |
Gerbera |
1000( in 100 sq.m. in poly house) |
2200 |
1:2.2 |
|
11 |
China aster |
500 |
1200 |
1:2.4 |
|
12 |
Tuberose |
500 |
1400 |
1:2.8 |
|
13 |
Roses |
600 |
1500 |
1:2.5 |
|
14 |
Acid lime |
2000 |
4200 |
1:2.1 |
|
15 |
Papaya |
2000 |
4500 |
1:2.3 |
|
16 |
Banana |
2000 |
5500 |
1:2.75 |
HOT WATER TREATMENT (HWT) OF MANGOES
Post harvest losses in mangoes in majority
of varieties / hybrids has
been to the tune of 30%. The major problems are pests like fruit fly and
anthracnose fruit rot and Non-uniform ripening. These are causing
heavy revenue loss and heavy damage to mango exports. To overcome this
problem, IIHR, Bangalore has standardized Hot Water Treatment technology
for Mango. "Dipping of fruits in hot water of specific temperature
for specified periods for the purpose of disease control, insect damage,
disinfestation or uniform ripening is known as Hot Water Treatment
". This is also most important in quarantine treatment for exports
of fruits. This also has additional benefits like removal of surface
pesticide residues, helps to remove sap of fallen in fruit surface
during harvest and facilitates washing also.
The hot water treatment plants requires the use of a specialized
equipment, to control the temperature of the water bath essential for
the process. A circulating pump or some other method should be utilized
to mix the water to assure uniformity of temperature within the tank.
Temperature monitors should be placed within the treatment tank.
The ratio of volume of water to fruiting stock should be large
enough to prevent a significant drop in temperature when the stock is
added. Sometimes fungicides are added to hot water to bring about
efficient post harvest disease control. After
treating with HW, the fruit should be allowed to cool and dry in
preparation for grading and packing.
HW treatment
for Export purpose.
-
The
mangoes must be treated in the country of origin at a certified facility.
-
Fruit
temperature should not be less than 20oC before starting the
treatment.
-
Fruit
must be sub-merged atleast 4 inches below the water's surface
-
Water
must circulate constantly throughout the treatment
-
The
duration of the hot water
-
dip treatment is determined based on the origin, shape, and
weight of the mangoes.
The
above technology has been perfected at this Institute and a pilot hot
water treatment plant on a small scale has been fabricated. This
technology has been recommended for -
It
was observed that 460C for 65min treatment could control both
fruit fly and anthracnose and 520C for5min could control
anthracnose only. The capacity of hot water treatment plant at 460C
for 65min treatment is 0.25 ton/hour and at 520C for 5min is
1 ton/ha.
HW
treatment was more effective in controlling the spoilage of mangoes
during long term storage under normal LT conditions and reduces the
spoilage by more than 50 per cent compared to fungicide treatment. At
130C, HW treated fruits of mangoes could be stored for 21-28
days (depending on the variety) without any spoilage.
HW
treatment also helped to reduce the spoilage during ripening of Control
Atmosphere (CA) stored mango fruits.
SOAP FROM
NON-EDIBLE OIL AS A BOTANICAL FOR INCREASING MARKETABLE YIELD OF CABBAGE
The control of diamond black moth (DBM) in Cabbage
has been a challenge to the scientists and farmers for last 3-4 decades.
The IVLP team of scientists introduced IPM strategy involving
spray of home made 4% Neem seed kernel at 20, 30, 40 and 50 days after
transplanting cabbage, instead of market pesticides. Though this gave
effective control, preparations of this extract is tedious and
irritating to the eyes.
Hence
a refinement to the existing methodology by preparing a semi-solid soap
from Neem and Pongamia was found safe and spray of this soap at 1%
at 20, 30, 40 and 50 days after transplanting resulted in significant
control and bringing down cost on pesticides to around Rs.4,000/- per hectare/year. This was also made available through the ATIC
Centre of IIHR and is being used by the farmers of the entire
Bangalore Rural District. The Pongamia soap is friendly to beneficial insects, produces pesticides free cabbage and beneficial to the consumers. The soap is a salt of potassium and it has also added to the
potassium status of the cabbage crop enhancing the resistance of the
crop to the pest. This has increased yield and enhances the resistance to DBM. Even if the market price
of cabbage falls the farmers are able to make profit because of the
saving of cost in pesticides by Rs.12,000/- per hectare.
USE OF INSECT PRO0F NYLON NETS FOR QUALITY VEGETABLE SEEDLING
PRODUCTION
Leaf
curl is a serious viral disease in tomato especially during hot/summer
months. The virus spreads through a vector- whitefly. To control
whitefly feeding on growing seedlings in nursery area, a 40-mesh nylon
net is used to cover the nursery area. Thus viral infection is avoided
till transplanting of seedlings in the main field. Viral diseases in
chili and capsicums like chilly mosaic and leaf curl can also be
controlled during nursery stage by providing nylon net coverage. This
technology can also be used, with 40 mesh nylon nets, to control Spotted
Wilt Virus of watermelon transmitted by thrips. The technology involves:
Twelve raised beds of 1.2m x 7.5m dimensions are to
be prepared for getting the seedlings for one hectare area of main field
(for tomato). Later the seeds started to germinate in the beds, 50 mesh
nylon nets have to be covered over the beds. Nylon nets have to be
stitched in the dimension of 1.2m width, 8.0m in length and 1.5m in
height resulting in a box shape. For
support of the net, Casuarinas or bamboo pads have to be used. While stitching a net, provision for entry in to the net have to
be made. This entry point
should be closable either with straps or clips, so that entire structure
becomes insect proof. The bottom edge of the net have to be buried the
soil. A non-walk in type net
coverings can also be prepared with 1-2 feet height net covering. A
movable support system can also be prepared with ¾” GI pipe or
a-iron.
Transmission of viral diseases in nursery stage by
vectors is avoided. As net also modify the microclimate inside, in terms
of humidity and reduced sunlight, healthy seedling can be raised with
this technology. Based on
land holding of the farmer, even a 1 or 2 m2 area can also be
covered with net. The
height of the net can be even 1-2 feet for non walk-in type of nylon net
protection structure.
FOLIAR NUTRITION TO ESTABLISH
BANANA AS AN ALTERNATE CROP IN RESOURCE POOR SITUATION
The IVLP of IIHR,
Bangalore team interacted with the farmers and suggested Integrated
Nutrient Management involving supplying 50% of
nutrients by spray on leaf and bunch (0.5% urea, 0.5% SOP, 0.2% ZnSO4
and 0.1% Boric Acid) four sprays on leaf from 5th month to 8th month and
two sprays on bunches and leaves in 10th and 11th month and improving
root health by application of Trichoderma enriched FYM resulted in
yield increased to 30 kg/bunch from 25kg in farmers practice in cultivar
Robusta and decrease in cost of cultivation by Rs.6,000/-.
Since use of costly
surfactants limited the spread of technology, a refinement involving use
of one Rupee shampoo sachets available in all the village shops as
surfactants and use of juice of one lime fruit to adjust the pH to 5.5
to 6.0 resulted in significant increase in foliar spray efficiently and
yield increased to 35-40kg. But the higher yield resulted in water
stress and sandy soil texture was one reason. Hence, the technology was
once more refined by filling the pit at planting with tank silt clayey
in texture but with more than 55% water-holding capacity. This resulted
in mean bunch yield increasing an average of 40-45 inspite of being
under conventional irrigation. The crop was early by 32 days reducing
the cropping duration and saving on precious inputs like water, nutrient
and land. The reduced soil application of nutrients and saving of
nutrients also made this an environment friendly technology.
The technology has
been disseminated. The technology has spread geographically to two
districts. Foliar formulations were prepared in the Division of Soil
Science and Agricultural Chemistry and supplied through Agricultural
Technology Information Centre (ATIC) of IIHR, Bangalore.
Kestur called
Tharkari Halli (vegetable village) has become Balegrama (Banana
Village). Banana suckers from this village are sought after by farmers
of neighbouring taluks and is sold at a premium rate and has added to
the profitability. Foliar nutrition technology also has been
disseminated. In drought year the banana leaves are being fed to milch
animals as alternate green fodder which is an additional benefit because
of popularity of banana as an alternate crop.
REINTRODUCTION OF BRINJAL IN
VEGETABLE BASED CROPPING SYSTEM
Due to the
very perishable nature of vegetables and fluctuating prices, farmers
spread their risk by growing a range of vegetables of differing keeping
quality, input requirements and skill. Farmers of Kestur village, could
not cultivate brinjal, a less water demanding crop than tomato for the
last 10 years due to severe incidence of ash weevil and nematode at
early stage and fruit borer at harvest stage resulting in less
marketable produce. The inter-disciplinary team of IVLP of IIHR,
Bangalore interacted with the farmers recommended soil application of
Carboturan 3G at 10 kg/ha at planting and spraying of Cypermethrin at
0.5 ml/lt. four times at 35 days after planting repeated every 15 days,
resulted in good establishment of seedlings but Rs.10,000/- per hectare
spent on pesticides resulted in high cost and more pesticide residues
and hence was not sustainable. This problem was tacked by the IVLP team
using the plant products to control the nematode; a component of
IPM technology standardized by IIHR, Bangalore. On-farm trials
indicated usefulness of soil application of neem cake at 250 kg/ha at
transplanting and three sprays of Cypermethrin at 0.5 ml/lt. resulted in
effective control of ash weevil, nematodes and fruit borer and enabled
farmers of Kestur village to cultivate brinjal once again and
increase marketable yield by 20% but
this again was not cost effective.
Hence application of
neem cake 250 kg/ha at to planting and again at 30 days after planting
resulted in control of fruit borer incidence by 75%.
Nematodes and ash weevil were also under check and contributed to fruit
yield increase. The use of 500 kg of neem cake costs Rs. 2,000/-
whereas Rs. 10,000/- per ha was spent on chemical control. The
consumers also could get a residue free brinjal in the
market. Restoration of brinjal (which can tolerate moisture stress
better than tomato and cabbage) as one of the vegetable crops that can
be again cultivated has increased the option and confidence of the
village farmers.
MORE
RATOONS AND BETTER LAND UTILIZATION FOR HIGHER INCOME IN BANANA BASED
CROPPING SYSTEMS
The
introduction of banana as an alternate crop to vegetables has been
stabilized in Kestur village near Bangalore and about 60 small and
marginal farmers (90 acres) have taken up Banana. But since the
investment is heavy at Rs.1,20,000/ha/year and the farmer has to wait
for 12 months to realize income from banana, farmers had to borrow money
for family expenses. Ratoons were not profitable than main crop, farmers
were taking only one ratoon, due to decline in yield in the second
ratoon (25kg) due to poor root health and nutrition. The IVLP team of
IIHR, Bangalore which has adopted this village found that build-up of
nematode and pathogenic fungal population were found to be the reasons
for sudden yield decline. Based on the IPM technology developed by the
Institute, the IVLP team suggested;
(a)
Use of Trichoderma fungal cultures multiplied in FYM at 2 kg/tree twice,
once at planting and another 3 months after first application was
recommended to the farmers, with 50% nutrient application through six
foliar sprays and 50% through soil for increasing ratoon yield, and
(b)
Growing of short duration vegetables like coriander, french bean, palak
in the first six months of planting main crop and first 3 months after
harvesting a ratoon crop.
One
farmer who planted main crop in 1996 and taken six ratoon crops and
earned a net income of Rs.17.10 lakhs/ha for 6 ratoons over a six
year period was an inspiration for the other farmers. With the
successful cultivation of one main crop and six ratoon crops by
Mr. Krishnappa, more ratoons (2-3) has become the accepted practice for
30-40 farmers in the village. The banana crop was also used as a
shade crop to arecanut.
The
IVLP team also recommended banana based cropping system for higher
revenue. One farmer from Kestur village had only 0.75 acre land
and taken French bean as inter-crop in the main banana and two ratoon
banana and three coriander inter-crops has earned a income of
Rs.86,000/ha in four years (one main crop + 3 ratoons) in addition
to income from banana at Rs.1,80,000/ha/year. This resulted in best
utilization of the precious inputs like water and land. The foliar
sprayed plants started yielding 32 days early and the fruits did not
deteriorate in shops fast. The success this farmer promoted other
farmers also to grow vegetables as inter-crops in banana. |